返回列表

成绩第一却因虐猫被刷？考研也要过品德关| 新京报快评——秒词邦背单词app

2024-04-05 16:39 来源:秒词邦阅读:230

学习并不是埋首书本就够了，心地善良、尊重生命这些最基本的价值观，同样是必修课。

▲资料图：某大学图书馆内，学生在复习备考。图/新华社

文| 夏研

近日，网传一报考南京大学物理学院研究生学位的男子，尽管专业课成绩排名第一但仍被刷下来，原因疑似是其思想品德考核不过关。

据潇湘晨报报道，在此之前，有多名网友在网络平台发帖，向学校反映，该名学生存在严重素质问题：曾在学校宿舍录视频虐杀猫，还加入过一个以虐猫为乐的网络团伙。

在相关公示名单里，学校在其名后备注“复试不合格”，而记者从南京大学相关部门了解到，网传信息部分为真。当记者询问复试是否考虑虐猫事件时，学校回应：“这些行为都有可能会影响。”

从媒体目前的报道，人们很难看到事件全貌，而对于该生为何复试被刷，学校的回复也不是特别明确。因此，面对舆论热度，涉事高校不妨将该生“复试不合格”的具体原因说得更明确些，以回应舆论猜测。

这位考生的考试成绩确实是优秀的。从校方公示的信息可以看到，在本次考试中，该男子位于粒子物理与原子核物理专业第一名。但在媒体报道里，他的虐猫行为又很残忍，他在学校宿舍虐杀猫，还录制视频上传到网络。

在此背景下，如果学校真的因为虐猫而将其黜落，其实也是有依据的。教育部发布的《2024年全国硕士研究生招生工作管理规定》，其中就有专章包括“思想政治素质和品德考核”；南京大学的《2024年硕士研究生复试录取工作细则》也包括“对于思想品德考核不合格者不予录取”。

虐猫行为当然属于一种思想品德不良，如果该生真因此被刷，也完全可以理解。2023年9月，河南南阳理工学院一学生就因为虐猫被直接开除；2020年，山东理工大学也将一位虐猫学生开除。

这些都表明，对大学生的虐猫行为，教育界也渐渐形成了一种共识，对漠视生命的行为采取更鲜明的态度。

一直以来，不少高校对于考研学子的道德品质都看得相当重，而学校的这一行为也是向大学生发出信号：学习并不是埋首书本就够了，心地善良、尊重生命这些最基本的价值观，同样是必修课。学习不只是获得一种工具化的能力，更是一种人格的塑造，大学生对此应当有更深切的认知。

当然，教育体系对此也应当有所反思。近些年大学生虐待动物的情况并不鲜见，其中不乏名校大学生，有些甚至参与了地下虐待动物的组织，通过这种方式牟利。这些都在提醒，生命教育确实也应该加强了。

今年全国两会上，有全国人大代表就建议，加强青少年对生命的由来、如何实施自我保护、如何尊重和敬畏自己和他人的生命等内容的认知，将“生命关怀”主题的教育尽快落实到学校校本课程的开发。而类似意见，近年已经成为一个社会热点。

从立德树人的角度看，处罚虐待动物的学生本身不是目的，这是一种惩戒形式。而如何在教育内容里，让学生真正地学会敬畏生命、爱护动物，整体改善这一频发的恶行，才是一个更深远也更厚重的课题。

另外值得一提的是，南京大学虽然已经公布这位考生不合格，但从社交平台上的舆论动向看，一些网友显然没打算放过他，还到疑似他要调剂的学校去施加压力，似乎要将他彻底挡在大学的门外。

虐猫行为确实让人气愤，但这也并不是一个不赦之罪。这位学生曾被公安机关约谈，处分也只是“写下悔过书，承诺不再有类似情况发生”。这说明在现行法律下，这种行为的恶劣程度尚够不上治安处罚，遑论入刑。

那么如果因为这个行为，这位学生就被长期追踪，并彻底被剥夺高等教育的权利，这相当于在法律之外给人留了“案底”，这种处罚是否过当？他是否有可能通过某种方式来弥补这种过错？

这些其实都是严肃话题，需要被各方认真对待。毕竟一个人的权利如果仅因为舆论的怒火被剥夺，这在逻辑上也存有问题。因此，如何在法律层面予以更清晰的界定，还需要更持续的讨论。而专业课排名第一的学生考研复试被刷，也需要涉事高校向公众提供更多有效信息。

撰稿 / 夏研（媒体人）

编辑 / 马小龙

校对 / 张彦君

新闻译文：

▲ Data chart: In a university library, students are reviewing and preparing for exams. Image/Xinhua News Agency

Recently, it was rumored online that a man who applied for a graduate degree in the School of Physics at Nanjing University, despite ranking first in professional courses, was still rejected due to his suspected failure in ideological and moral assessment.

According to the Xiaoxiang Morning Post, several netizens had previously posted on online platforms, reporting to the school that the student had serious quality problems: he had recorded videos of killing cats in the school dormitory and also joined an online gang that enjoyed cat abuse.

In the relevant public announcement list, the school noted "failed the interview" after its name, and the reporter learned from the relevant departments of Nanjing University that the information transmitted online is true. When asked by reporters if the interview was considering the cat abuse incident, the school responded, "These behaviors may all have an impact."

From current media reports, it is difficult for people to see the full picture of the incident, and the school's response to why the student was rejected in the interview is not particularly clear. Therefore, in the face of public opinion heat, the universities involved may want to explain more clearly the specific reasons for the student's failure in the interview, in response to public speculation.

This candidate's exam results are indeed excellent. according to the information disclosed by the school, the man ranked first in the particle physics and nuclear physics major in this exam. But in media reports, his cat abuse behavior is also very cruel. He killed cats in school dormitories and even recorded videos to upload to the internet.

In this context, if schools really dismiss cats for abusing them, there is actually a basis. The "2024 National Master's Graduate Enrollment management Regulations" issued by the Ministry of Education includes a special chapter on "Assessment of Ideological and Political Quality and Moral Character"; The "2024 Master's Candidate Recruitment Work Rules" of Nanjing University also includes "those who fail the ideological and moral assessment will not be admitted.".

Cat abuse behavior is certainly a form of ideological and moral misconduct, and if the student is really criticized for it, it can be fully understood. In September 2023, a student from Nanyang Institute of Technology in Henan Province was directly expelled for abusing cats; In 2020, Shandong University of Technology also expelled a student who abused cats.

All of these indicate that the education community has gradually formed a consensus on the behavior of cat abuse among college students, adopting a more distinct attitude towards behavior that disregards life.

Many universities have always attached great importance to the moral qualities of students who take the postgraduate entrance examination, and this behavior of the school also sends a signal to college students: learning is not just about burying oneself in books. The most basic values of kindness and respect for life are also compulsory courses. Learning is not just about acquiring a tool like ability, but also about shaping one's personality. College students should have a deeper understanding of this.

Of course, the education system should also reflect on this. In recent years, it has not been uncommon for college students to abuse animals, including some from prestigious universities. Some even participate in underground animal abuse organizations and make profits through this method. These are all reminders that life education should indeed be strengthened.

At this year's National People's Congress and Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference, a representative of the National People's Congress suggested strengthening the awareness of young people about the origin of life, how to implement self-protection, and how to respect and respect the lives of themselves and others. The theme of "life care" education should be implemented as soon as possible in the development of school-based curriculum in schools. similar opinions have become a social hot topic in recent years.

From the perspective of cultivating virtue and nurturing people, punishing students who abuse animals is not the end in itself, but rather a form of punishment. And how to make students truly learn to respect life, love animals, and improve this frequent evil behavior as a whole in educational content is a more profound and profound issue.

Another noteworthy point is that although Nanjing University has announced that the candidate did not pass the exam, from the public opinion on social media, some netizens clearly did not intend to let him go and even put pressure on the school suspected of being transferred, as if to completely block him out of the university.

Cat abuse is indeed infuriating, but it is not an unforgivable crime. This student was once interviewed by the public security organs, and the punishment was only to write a letter of repentance, promising that similar situations would not happen again. This indicates that under current laws, the severity of such behavior is not yet sufficient for public security punishment, let alone imprisonment.

So if because of this behavior, this student is being tracked for a long time and completely deprived of the right to higher education, which is equivalent to leaving a "record" for others outside of the law, is this punishment too appropriate? Is it possible for him to make up for this mistake in some way?

These are actually serious topics that need to be taken seriously by all parties. After all, if a person's rights are deprived solely due to the anger of public opinion, there is also a logical problem. Therefore, more continuous discussion is needed on how to provide a clearer definition at the legal level. The top ranked students in professional courses who were rejected in the postgraduate entrance examination interview also require the universities involved to provide more effective information to the public.

Author/Xia Yan (Media Person)

Editor/Ma Xiaolong

Proofreading/Zhang Yanjun

重点词汇

大学图书馆 library ; University Library ; academic libraries
南京大学 Nanjing University
研究生学位 Graduate degree ; Postgraduate Degrees ; Post-Graduate
专业课 specialized course ; major
思想品德 ideology and morality ; Moral Education ; moral character
在此之前 before ; before that ; heretofore
网络平台 platform ; network platform ; online platform ; network
在学校 at school ; In the school ; in school
不合格 unqualified ; off-grade ; below grade ; below proof
相关部门 Related department ; departments concerned ; relevant department

句子成分分析：

This indicates | that [under current laws], the severity (of such behavior) is not yet sufficient for public security

punishment, let alone imprisonment.

句子语法结构详解：

* indicates 为谓语，采用一般现在时。动词采用第三人称单数形式。

* that 为连词，引导宾语从句。

* is 为系动词作谓语，采用一般现在时。

* sufficient 为形容词作表语。

* this 为指示代词。the 为定冠词。

句子相关词汇解释：

Phrase:

not yet 还没

be sufficient for... 足够...

let alone 更别提，更别说，更不必说

Vocabulary:

this [θis] pron 这(个)

indicate ['indikeit] vt. 1) 表明，显示 2) 象征，暗示

under ['ʌndә] prep. 1) 在（某年龄）以下 2) 在...下面, 在...下方

current ['kʌrәnt] a. 1) 当前的，现在的，现时发生的 2) 通用的，流通的，流行的

law [lɔ:] n. 1) 法律，法规 2) 原理，定律

severity [si'veriti] n. 严格, 朴素, 激烈

such [sʌtʃ] a. 1) 这样的,这种的, 如此的 2) (强调程度)这么, 非常

behavior [bi'heivjә] n. 1) 行为，举止，态度 2) （人、动植物、化学品等的）表现方式，活动方式

public ['pʌblik] a. 1) 公共的，公立的 2) 平民的，大众的，公众的，百姓的

security [si'kjuriti] n. 1) 安全，平安 2) 保护措施, 保卫部门, 安全工作 3) (securities)证券

punishment ['pʌniʃmәnt] n. 1) 惩罚，处罚，刑罚 2) 粗暴对待，虐待

imprisonment [im'priznmәnt] n. 监禁, 下狱, 坐牢

句子成分分析：

[After all], if a person's rights are deprived [solely] [due to the anger (of public opinion)], || there is [also] a logical problem.

句子语法结构详解：

* if 为连词，引导条件状语从句。

* deprived 为谓语，采用一般现在时和被动语态。

* there 引导 there be ... 句型, 表示“有”的意思。

* is 为系动词作谓语，采用一般现在时。

* are 为助动词。person's 为名词所有格。the 为定冠词。a 为不定冠词。

句子相关词汇解释：

Phrase:

after all 1) 毕竟, 终究, 归根结底 2) (当为了解释时）别忘了，到底

due to 由于

public opinion 舆论；民意

Vocabulary:

if [if] conj. 1) 如果, 倘若 2) 是否

person ['pә:sn] n. 1) 人，个人 2) （泛指）人，某人

right [rait] n. 1) 正当的要求，权利 2) 正当，公正，正义，正确

deprive [di'praiv] vt. 剥夺；使丧失

solely ['sәulli] ad. 仅，只，惟，单独地

anger ['æŋgә] n. 怒，怒火，怒气

also ['ɔ:lsәu] ad. 而且；此外；也；同样

logical ['lɔdʒikәl] a. 1) 符合逻辑的，按照逻辑的 2) （行动、事件等）必然的，合乎情理的，合乎常理的

problem ['prɔblәm] n. 1) 棘手的问题，难题，困难 2) 逻辑题，数学题